Managed Forgejo comparison
How Fjord compares.
The real buying criteria are practical: dedicated or shared tenancy, upstream Forgejo or a fork, fully managed operations or infrastructure only, per-seat or per-instance pricing, region and jurisdiction posture, CI, Pages, mobile access, CLI, migration, export, no-AI-training terms, and published certifications. The right answer depends on which of those constraints is binding.
Find the short list
What are you looking for?
Fjord
Managed upstream Forgejo with dedicated tenancy, per-instance pricing, mobile and CLI, Pages, CI, export, and written no-AI-training terms.
Codebahn
Managed Forgejo from a Swedish company, using a maintained Forgejo fork on EU-only infrastructure.
Codey by VSHN
A dedicated Forgejo instance managed by VSHN, hosted in Europe and Switzerland.
Forgejo Services
Managed Forgejo hosting, support, consulting, training, and ISO27001 reporting tooling from a Coderial BV project.
Elestio
Managed Gitea on dedicated cloud instances, from a broad managed open-source app platform.
Gitea Cloud
A commercial Gitea Cloud offering with public pricing.
Decision Boundaries
Codebahn
Managed Forgejo from a Swedish company, using a maintained Forgejo fork on EU-only infrastructure.
- Choose them when
- Choose Codebahn when EU-only infrastructure, capacity pricing, a documented MCP server, and Forgejo extensions are central buying criteria.
- Choose Fjord when
- Choose Fjord when you want upstream Forgejo, a dedicated single-tenant instance, region choice beyond the EU, native iPhone/iPad access, Pages, and a contractual no-AI-training commitment.
Codey by VSHN
A dedicated Forgejo instance managed by VSHN, hosted in Europe and Switzerland.
- Choose them when
- Choose Codey when Swiss operations, VSHN services, and published ISO 27001 plus ISAE 3402 evidence matter more than a Fjord-shaped product surface.
- Choose Fjord when
- Choose Fjord when you want upstream Forgejo with per-instance pricing, native mobile access, Pages, CLI, export, and a published no-AI-training commitment.
Forgejo Services
Managed Forgejo hosting, support, consulting, training, and ISO27001 reporting tooling from a Coderial BV project.
- Choose them when
- Choose Forgejo Services when Coderial BV consulting, managed Forgejo operations, Forgejo Actions implementation, or ISO27001 reporting support are the buying driver.
- Choose Fjord when
- Choose Fjord when you need published pricing, dedicated tenancy, region choices, Pages, mobile, CLI, export, and no-AI-training terms.
Elestio
Managed Gitea on dedicated cloud instances, from a broad managed open-source app platform.
- Choose them when
- Choose Elestio when you want one hosting panel for many open-source apps, worldwide regions, and Gitea rather than Forgejo.
- Choose Fjord when
- Choose Fjord when the forge itself is the product: upstream Forgejo, CI, Pages, mobile, CLI, export, and no-AI-training terms in one managed service.
Gitea Cloud
A commercial Gitea Cloud offering with public pricing.
- Choose them when
- Choose Gitea Cloud when you specifically want Gitea and its commercial cloud pricing fits your procurement path.
- Choose Fjord when
- Choose Fjord when you want managed Forgejo, dedicated tenancy, CI, Pages, mobile access, CLI, export, and documented no-AI-training terms.
Codeberg
A public, non-profit, Forgejo-based platform operated by Codeberg e.V.
- Choose them when
- Choose Codeberg for free or community public Free Software hosting and Codeberg Pages.
- Choose Fjord when
- Choose Fjord when your team needs a private, dedicated, supported Forgejo instance with managed operations and commercial terms.
Self-hosting
Your team runs Forgejo, backups, mail, runners, upgrades, observability, and incident response.
- Choose them when
- Choose self-hosting when full infrastructure control and internal operations ownership are required.
- Choose Fjord when
- Choose Fjord when you want Forgejo without carrying the pager, patch cycle, backup checks, and runner operations yourself.
GitHub
The default commercial code platform, with GitHub Actions, Pages, Mobile, Enterprise Cloud data residency, and enterprise compliance reports.
- Choose them when
- Choose GitHub when the ecosystem, marketplace, enterprise integrations, or published compliance program is the deciding factor.
- Choose Fjord when
- Choose Fjord when you want Forgejo, per-instance pricing, a dedicated instance, simpler exit, and a written no-AI-training commitment.
GitLab
A broad DevSecOps platform with GitLab.com, GitLab Dedicated, GitLab CI/CD, Pages, and published trust-center evidence.
- Choose them when
- Choose GitLab when you need a wide DevSecOps suite, GitLab Dedicated, or published SOC and ISO evidence.
- Choose Fjord when
- Choose Fjord when a narrower managed Forgejo service fits better than adopting a larger platform.
Capabilities Table
This table is conservative. If a public source did not document a capability, the cell says so instead of filling the gap from assumption.
| Dimension | Fjord | Codebahn | Codey | Forgejo Services | Elestio | Codeberg | Gitea Cloud | GitHub | GitLab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Managed Forgejo | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No, Gitea | Different use case | No, Gitea | No | No |
| Tenancy | Dedicated | Not documented | Dedicated | Not documented | Dedicated | Shared public platform | Not documented | Depends on plan | Depends on product |
| Forgejo base | Upstream Forgejo | Maintained fork | Not documented | Not documented | No, Gitea | Forgejo-based | No, Gitea | No | No |
| Hosted CI | Yes | Yes | Yes | Actions consulting | Not documented | Limited / customer-operated | Not documented | Yes | Yes |
| Pages | Yes | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Yes | Not documented | Yes | Yes |
| Native mobile app | Yes | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Yes | Not documented |
| CLI | Yes | Yes | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Yes | Not documented |
| Public MCP server | Not documented | Yes | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented |
| Region / jurisdiction posture | EU, US, Singapore; US-operated | EU-only; Sweden | Europe / Switzerland | Coderial BV; NL and FR addresses | Worldwide; Ireland | Berlin non-profit | Not documented | Enterprise regions by plan | Dedicated available |
| Pricing model | Per-instance | Capacity | Size / storage | Not documented | Instance | Free public platform | Public pricing | Per-user / account | Per-user |
| Managed backups | By plan | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented |
| No-AI-training commitment | Yes | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented |
| Published compliance certifications | No | No | Yes | No published cert | Not documented | Not documented | Not documented | Yes | Yes |
Go Deeper
vs Codebahn
EU-only, MCP, and a Forgejo fork compared with Fjord’s upstream, dedicated model.
vs Codey
A VSHN-managed dedicated Forgejo instance with Swiss posture and ISO evidence.
vs Forgejo Services
A Coderial BV managed Forgejo and consulting offer compared with Fjord.
vs self-hosting Forgejo
The same software, minus the pager. What you stop owning when we run it.
vs Elestio
Managed Gitea from a broad open-source app platform, compared with managed Forgejo.
vs Gitea Cloud
Gitea-specific commercial cloud pricing compared with Fjord’s Forgejo model.
vs GitLab
A broad DevSecOps platform compared with a narrower managed Forgejo service.
vs Codeberg
A public nonprofit Forgejo platform compared with private managed Forgejo.
vs GitHub
Leaving the default. What changes, what you keep, and what gets better.
Check the architecture notes, data residency page, no-AI-training terms, and pricing before you choose.